A new Pull Request was created by @abhih1 (Abhirami Harilal) for CMSSW_12_5_X.

It involves the following packages:

• DQM/EcalMonitorClient (dqm)
• DQM/EcalMonitorTasks (dqm)

@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @syuvivida, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rchatter, @simonepigazzini, @thomreis, @argiro this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from Add TTID integrity error plots for ECAL DQM [Master] #40072

type ecal

backport of #40072

please test

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-dc2850/29025/summary.html
COMMIT: e0a5153
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-11-15-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/40073/29025/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3734871
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1797
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3733051
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 768.776 KiB( 50 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1000.0,... ): 18.477 KiB EcalBarrel/EBIntegrityTask
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1000.0,... ): 7.848 KiB EcalEndcap/EEIntegrityTask
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 0.406 KiB EcalBarrel/EBIntegrityTask
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 0.266 KiB EcalEndcap/EEIntegrityTask
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
• Checked 216 log files, 49 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

+1

• DQM comparison differences in E[E,B]IntegrityClient and E[E,B]SummaryClient as expected.
• tested and deployed at P5

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_5_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

+1

• Merging just to have the offline release aligned with what deployed in the online DQM release at P5 at the end of the data taking: there will be no real usage for this PR in a possible future release in this cycle.